Economic integration

A bill on fair housing to promote racial and economic integration

Researchers at the University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School and the Reinvestment Fund published “A Total Effort to Achieve Desegregation and Equal Opportunity: Fair Housing Assessment 2.0.” », An innovative research paper that proposes the use of equitable housing. law to work towards the end of segregation. In the report, the authors Provost and James S. Riepe Presidential Professor of Law and Education Wendell E. Pritchett, Erica V. Rodarte Costa and Ira J. Goldstein and Emily S. Dowdall of the Reinvestment Fund point out that the Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing ( AFFH) The provision of the Fair Housing Act (FHA) is an obligation that attaches to all federal agencies, not just the US Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD).

The brief rests on the premise that the Fair Housing Act (FHA), which was passed over 50 years ago, “has still not had the impact its drafters hoped for.” The authors find that segregation remains a problem even in cities like Philadelphia, where although residential racial desegregation has declined over the past decade, the measures still place the city in the “highly segregated” category.

They recommend using the Fair Housing Assessment (AFH), a planning tool created by the Obama administration that helps implement the AFHH, “as a framework to dramatically increase racial justice through a coordinated approach to racial and economic integration into American communities “.

To determine what worked in the way localities approached fair housing through the AFH, which was canceled under the Trump administration, the authors conducted structured interviews with former HUD officials, local housing officials in New Orleans, Houston, Kansas City (MO), Indianapolis, and Philadelphia; and fair housing experts and advocates.

“[W]We suggest that the revived AFH of the Biden administration reaffirm, at least in part, the goal of making all communities good places – and clarify that the goal is not simply to ban the production of subsidized housing. or to help people leave places that are not presently, ”the authors write.

Learn more at Penn Law News.


Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *